Name: Aaron Terr

Affiliation: Foundation for Individual Rights in Education

Location: UConn Storrs

Request Date Start: Withheld.

Request Date End: Withheld.

Details: 1. Any settlement agreement or other document reflecting the terms or amount of any settlement reached in Thurmand v. Univ. of Connecticut, 2019 WL 1763202 (D. Conn. Apr. 22, 2019).

2. Any court order, decree, or judgment directing the University of Connecticut to pay any damages, fees, or costs in Thurmand v. Univ. of Connecticut, 2019 WL 1763202 (D. Conn. Apr. 22, 2019).

3. Any retainer agreement, fee arrangement, engagement letter, or other contract with any law firm or attorney which applied to any firm’s or attorney’s representation of the University of Connecticut (or any of its officials or employees) in connection with Thurmand v. Univ. of Connecticut, 2019 WL 1763202 (D. Conn. Apr. 22, 2019).

4. Any invoices, time sheets, accountings, statements, or bills generated by any law firm or attorney concerning services provided to the University of Connecticut (or any of its officials or employees) in connection with Thurmand v. Univ. of Connecticut, 2019 WL 1763202 (D. Conn. Apr. 22, 2019). This request does not seek, and the University of Connecticut may redact, the substantive descriptions of the work of an attorney or law firm. However, if any such document references matters unrelated to Thurmand v. Univ. of Connecticut, 2019 WL 1763202 (D. Conn. Apr. 22, 2019), please differentiate between redactions related to this case and those related to other matters. The intent of this request is to identify the total costs incurred in connection with Thurmand v. Univ. of Connecticut, 2019 WL 1763202 (D. Conn. Apr. 22, 2019).

5. Any insurance agreement or contract under which the University of Connecticut has sought or been provided coverage, including under a reservation of rights, concerning the claims at issue in Thurmand v. Univ. of Connecticut, 2019 WL 1763202 (D. Conn. Apr. 22, 2019).

These requests do not seek disclosure of text which is subject to the attorney-client privilege or work-product doctrine because it describes an attorney’s advice, impressions, opinions, legal analysis, or strategy. Any such information should be redacted.

Notes: